Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Cardioform versus Amplatzer and Medical Therapy Alone for Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: A UK Payer Perspective.

Bentham JR, Neervoort J, Louwsma T, Wolters LF, Lyon J, Landaas EJ, Nakum M

Open source

DOI
10.2147/ceor.s625089
Published
2026
Container
ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.2147/ceor.s625089,
  title = {Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Cardioform versus Amplatzer and Medical Therapy Alone for Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: A UK Payer Perspective.},
  author = {Bentham JR and Neervoort J and Louwsma T and Wolters LF and Lyon J and Landaas EJ and Nakum M},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR},
  doi = {10.2147/ceor.s625089},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.2147/ceor.s625089}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Cardioform versus Amplatzer and Medical Therapy Alone for Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: A UK Payer Perspective.
AU  - Bentham JR
AU  - Neervoort J
AU  - Louwsma T
AU  - Wolters LF
AU  - Lyon J
AU  - Landaas EJ
AU  - Nakum M
PY  - 2026
JO  - ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR
DO  - 10.2147/ceor.s625089
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2147/ceor.s625089
ER  - 

APA

JR, B., J, N., T, L., LF, W., J, L., EJ, L., & M, N. (2026). Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Cardioform versus Amplatzer and Medical Therapy Alone for Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: A UK Payer Perspective.. ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR. https://doi.org/10.2147/ceor.s625089

Source records