Fospropofol vs Propofol for Early Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
- DOI
- 10.2147/dddt.s636353
- Published
- 2026
- Container
- Drug design, development and therapy
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.2147/dddt.s636353,
title = {Fospropofol vs Propofol for Early Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.},
author = {Ma L and Guo Y and Wang W and Lin C and Yuan Y and Wu H and Liu Z and Du W},
year = {2026},
journal = {Drug design, development and therapy},
doi = {10.2147/dddt.s636353},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2147/dddt.s636353}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Fospropofol vs Propofol for Early Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. AU - Ma L AU - Guo Y AU - Wang W AU - Lin C AU - Yuan Y AU - Wu H AU - Liu Z AU - Du W PY - 2026 JO - Drug design, development and therapy DO - 10.2147/dddt.s636353 UR - https://doi.org/10.2147/dddt.s636353 ER -
APA
L, M., Y, G., W, W., C, L., Y, Y., H, W., Z, L., & W, D. (2026). Fospropofol vs Propofol for Early Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Prophylaxis in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.. Drug design, development and therapy. https://doi.org/10.2147/dddt.s636353
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T17:13:17.588Z