A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Tearcare(®) and Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease (SAHARA) [Response To Letter].
- DOI
- 10.2147/opth.s468297
- Published
- 2024
- Container
- Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.2147/opth.s468297,
title = {A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Tearcare(®) and Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease (SAHARA) [Response To Letter].},
author = {Ayres BD and Bloomenstein MR and Loh J and Chester T and Saenz B and Ehegoyen J and Kannarr SR and Perez VL and Rodriguez TC and Dickerson JE Jr},
year = {2024},
journal = {Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)},
doi = {10.2147/opth.s468297},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s468297}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Tearcare(®) and Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease (SAHARA) [Response To Letter]. AU - Ayres BD AU - Bloomenstein MR AU - Loh J AU - Chester T AU - Saenz B AU - Ehegoyen J AU - Kannarr SR AU - Perez VL AU - Rodriguez TC AU - Dickerson JE Jr PY - 2024 JO - Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) DO - 10.2147/opth.s468297 UR - https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s468297 ER -
APA
BD, A., MR, B., J, L., T, C., B, S., J, E., SR, K., VL, P., TC, R., & Jr, D. J. (2024). A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Tearcare(®) and Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease (SAHARA) [Response To Letter].. Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.). https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s468297
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T02:06:37.321Z