Comparison of Clinician Review Time and Confidence with Optical Coherence Tomography Digital versus Print-Based Workflows: A Pilot Observer Study.

Uy HS, Artiaga JCM, Bromeo AJ, Chan PS, Cruz FM, Lorenzo KP, Manas-Lim KB, Onghanseng NG, Sakurai Y, Salongcay RP, Salvame EJA, Siopongco PG

Open source

DOI: 10.2147/opth.s580678
Published: 2026
Container: Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.2147/opth.s580678,
  title = {Comparison of Clinician Review Time and Confidence with Optical Coherence Tomography Digital versus Print-Based Workflows: A Pilot Observer Study.},
  author = {Uy HS and Artiaga JCM and Bromeo AJ and Chan PS and Cruz FM and Lorenzo KP and Manas-Lim KB and Onghanseng NG and Sakurai Y and Salongcay RP and Salvame EJA and Siopongco PG},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)},
  doi = {10.2147/opth.s580678},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s580678}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of Clinician Review Time and Confidence with Optical Coherence Tomography Digital versus Print-Based Workflows: A Pilot Observer Study.
AU  - Uy HS
AU  - Artiaga JCM
AU  - Bromeo AJ
AU  - Chan PS
AU  - Cruz FM
AU  - Lorenzo KP
AU  - Manas-Lim KB
AU  - Onghanseng NG
AU  - Sakurai Y
AU  - Salongcay RP
AU  - Salvame EJA
AU  - Siopongco PG
PY  - 2026
JO  - Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
DO  - 10.2147/opth.s580678
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s580678
ER  -

APA

HS, U., JCM, A., AJ, B., PS, C., FM, C., KP, L., KB, M., NG, O., Y, S., RP, S., EJA, S., & PG, S. (2026). Comparison of Clinician Review Time and Confidence with Optical Coherence Tomography Digital versus Print-Based Workflows: A Pilot Observer Study.. Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.). https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s580678

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T05:58:47.032Z