Wiltse Approach versus Conventional Open Approach in Neurologically Intact Patients with Thoracolumbar Fractures: Clinical and Radiological Outcome Study

Mohamed Shater, Mohamed Hassanein

Open source

DOI
10.21608/esj.2018.18389
Published
2018-07-01
Container
Egyptian Spine Journal
Publisher
Egyptian Knowledge Bank
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.21608/esj.2018.18389,
  title = {Wiltse Approach versus Conventional Open Approach in Neurologically Intact Patients with Thoracolumbar Fractures: Clinical and Radiological Outcome Study},
  author = {Mohamed Shater and Mohamed Hassanein},
  year = {2018},
  journal = {Egyptian Spine Journal},
  doi = {10.21608/esj.2018.18389},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.21608/esj.2018.18389}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Wiltse Approach versus Conventional Open Approach in Neurologically Intact Patients with Thoracolumbar Fractures: Clinical and Radiological Outcome Study
AU  - Mohamed Shater
AU  - Mohamed Hassanein
PY  - 2018
JO  - Egyptian Spine Journal
DO  - 10.21608/esj.2018.18389
UR  - https://doi.org/10.21608/esj.2018.18389
ER  - 

APA

Shater, M., & Hassanein, M. (2018). Wiltse Approach versus Conventional Open Approach in Neurologically Intact Patients with Thoracolumbar Fractures: Clinical and Radiological Outcome Study. Egyptian Spine Journal. https://doi.org/10.21608/esj.2018.18389

Source records