Perceived Ratings of AI-Generated and Expert-Reviewed vs Clinician-Developed Virtual Cardiology Patient Scenarios Among Medical Students: Randomized Controlled Study.
- DOI
- 10.2196/100839
- Published
- 2026 Oct 28
- Container
- JMIR medical education
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.2196/100839,
title = {Perceived Ratings of AI-Generated and Expert-Reviewed vs Clinician-Developed Virtual Cardiology Patient Scenarios Among Medical Students: Randomized Controlled Study.},
author = {Bantidos MG and Dafli E and Karagiannidis E and Fyntanidou B and Gilou S and Nasoufidou A and Bamidis P},
year = {2026},
journal = {JMIR medical education},
doi = {10.2196/100839},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2196/100839}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Perceived Ratings of AI-Generated and Expert-Reviewed vs Clinician-Developed Virtual Cardiology Patient Scenarios Among Medical Students: Randomized Controlled Study. AU - Bantidos MG AU - Dafli E AU - Karagiannidis E AU - Fyntanidou B AU - Gilou S AU - Nasoufidou A AU - Bamidis P PY - 2026 JO - JMIR medical education DO - 10.2196/100839 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/100839 ER -
APA
MG, B., E, D., E, K., B, F., S, G., A, N., & P, B. (2026). Perceived Ratings of AI-Generated and Expert-Reviewed vs Clinician-Developed Virtual Cardiology Patient Scenarios Among Medical Students: Randomized Controlled Study.. JMIR medical education. https://doi.org/10.2196/100839
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T05:18:00.322Z