Assessing the Reproducibility of the Structured Abstracts Generated by ChatGPT and Bard Compared to Human-Written Abstracts in the Field of Spine Surgery: Comparative Analysis.
- DOI
- 10.2196/52001
- Published
- 2024 Jun 26
- Container
- Journal of medical Internet research
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.2196/52001,
title = {Assessing the Reproducibility of the Structured Abstracts Generated by ChatGPT and Bard Compared to Human-Written Abstracts in the Field of Spine Surgery: Comparative Analysis.},
author = {Kim HJ and Yang JH and Chang DG and Lenke LG and Pizones J and Castelein R and Watanabe K and Trobisch PD and Mundis GM Jr and Suh SW and Suk SI},
year = {2024},
journal = {Journal of medical Internet research},
doi = {10.2196/52001},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2196/52001}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Assessing the Reproducibility of the Structured Abstracts Generated by ChatGPT and Bard Compared to Human-Written Abstracts in the Field of Spine Surgery: Comparative Analysis. AU - Kim HJ AU - Yang JH AU - Chang DG AU - Lenke LG AU - Pizones J AU - Castelein R AU - Watanabe K AU - Trobisch PD AU - Mundis GM Jr AU - Suh SW AU - Suk SI PY - 2024 JO - Journal of medical Internet research DO - 10.2196/52001 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/52001 ER -
APA
HJ, K., JH, Y., DG, C., LG, L., J, P., R, C., K, W., PD, T., Jr, M. G., SW, S., & SI, S. (2024). Assessing the Reproducibility of the Structured Abstracts Generated by ChatGPT and Bard Compared to Human-Written Abstracts in the Field of Spine Surgery: Comparative Analysis.. Journal of medical Internet research. https://doi.org/10.2196/52001
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T23:35:03.689Z