Hallucination Rates and Reference Accuracy of ChatGPT and Bard for Systematic Reviews: Comparative Analysis.

Chelli M, Descamps J, Lavoué V, Trojani C, Azar M, Deckert M, Raynier JL, Clowez G, Boileau P, Ruetsch-Chelli C

DOI: 10.2196/53164
Published: 2024 May 22
Container: Journal of medical Internet research
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.2196/53164,
  title = {Hallucination Rates and Reference Accuracy of ChatGPT and Bard for Systematic Reviews: Comparative Analysis.},
  author = {Chelli M and Descamps J and Lavoué V and Trojani C and Azar M and Deckert M and Raynier JL and Clowez G and Boileau P and Ruetsch-Chelli C},
  year = {2024},
  journal = {Journal of medical Internet research},
  doi = {10.2196/53164},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.2196/53164}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Hallucination Rates and Reference Accuracy of ChatGPT and Bard for Systematic Reviews: Comparative Analysis.
AU  - Chelli M
AU  - Descamps J
AU  - Lavoué V
AU  - Trojani C
AU  - Azar M
AU  - Deckert M
AU  - Raynier JL
AU  - Clowez G
AU  - Boileau P
AU  - Ruetsch-Chelli C
PY  - 2024
JO  - Journal of medical Internet research
DO  - 10.2196/53164
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/53164
ER  -

APA

M, C., J, D., V, L., C, T., M, A., M, D., JL, R., G, C., P, B., & C, R. (2024). Hallucination Rates and Reference Accuracy of ChatGPT and Bard for Systematic Reviews: Comparative Analysis.. Journal of medical Internet research. https://doi.org/10.2196/53164

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-24T22:27:42.893Z