FFR(CT) Analysis Rejections: Comparison of Frequency and Associated Factors Between Two CT Scanners.

Balasubramanian S, Rai A, Basunia A, Faisal J, Randazzo MJ

Open source

DOI
10.2214/ajr.26.35325
Published
2026 Jul 15
Container
AJR. American journal of roentgenology
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.2214/ajr.26.35325,
  title = {FFR(CT) Analysis Rejections: Comparison of Frequency and Associated Factors Between Two CT Scanners.},
  author = {Balasubramanian S and Rai A and Basunia A and Faisal J and Randazzo MJ},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {AJR. American journal of roentgenology},
  doi = {10.2214/ajr.26.35325},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.26.35325}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - FFR(CT) Analysis Rejections: Comparison of Frequency and Associated Factors Between Two CT Scanners.
AU  - Balasubramanian S
AU  - Rai A
AU  - Basunia A
AU  - Faisal J
AU  - Randazzo MJ
PY  - 2026
JO  - AJR. American journal of roentgenology
DO  - 10.2214/ajr.26.35325
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.26.35325
ER  - 

APA

S, B., A, R., A, B., J, F., & MJ, R. (2026). FFR(CT) Analysis Rejections: Comparison of Frequency and Associated Factors Between Two CT Scanners.. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.26.35325

Source records