Autograft versus allograft tenodesis for chronic ankle instability: a single-center retrospective comparative study.
- DOI
- 10.2217/cer-2020-0070
- Published
- 2020-12-23
- Container
- J Comp Eff Res
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.2217/cer-2020-0070,
title = {Autograft versus allograft tenodesis for chronic ankle instability: a single-center retrospective comparative study.},
author = {Legnani C and Borgo E and Macchi V and Ventura A.},
year = {2021},
journal = {J Comp Eff Res},
doi = {10.2217/cer-2020-0070},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2020-0070}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Autograft versus allograft tenodesis for chronic ankle instability: a single-center retrospective comparative study. AU - Legnani C AU - Borgo E AU - Macchi V AU - Ventura A. PY - 2021 JO - J Comp Eff Res DO - 10.2217/cer-2020-0070 UR - https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2020-0070 ER -
APA
C, L., E, B., V, M., & A., V. (2021). Autograft versus allograft tenodesis for chronic ankle instability: a single-center retrospective comparative study.. J Comp Eff Res. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2020-0070
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T19:16:48.662Z