Autograft versus allograft tenodesis for chronic ankle instability: a single-center retrospective comparative study.

Legnani C, Borgo E, Macchi V, Ventura A.

Open source

DOI
10.2217/cer-2020-0070
Published
2020-12-23
Container
J Comp Eff Res
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.2217/cer-2020-0070,
  title = {Autograft versus allograft tenodesis for chronic ankle instability: a single-center retrospective comparative study.},
  author = {Legnani C and  Borgo E and  Macchi V and  Ventura A.},
  year = {2021},
  journal = {J Comp Eff Res},
  doi = {10.2217/cer-2020-0070},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2020-0070}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Autograft versus allograft tenodesis for chronic ankle instability: a single-center retrospective comparative study.
AU  - Legnani C
AU  -  Borgo E
AU  -  Macchi V
AU  -  Ventura A.
PY  - 2021
JO  - J Comp Eff Res
DO  - 10.2217/cer-2020-0070
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2020-0070
ER  - 

APA

C, L., E, B., V, M., & A., V. (2021). Autograft versus allograft tenodesis for chronic ankle instability: a single-center retrospective comparative study.. J Comp Eff Res. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2020-0070

Source records