Bicruciate-retaining versus cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty in implant fixation: a 10-year follow-up of a randomized RSA trial.

Kinoshita T, Mortensen KRL, Ingelsrud LH, Muharemovic O, Gromov K, Troelsen A

Open source

DOI
10.2340/17453674.2026.46805
Published
2026 Sep 17
Container
Acta orthopaedica
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.2340/17453674.2026.46805,
  title = {Bicruciate-retaining versus cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty in implant fixation: a 10-year follow-up of a randomized RSA trial.},
  author = {Kinoshita T and Mortensen KRL and Ingelsrud LH and Muharemovic O and Gromov K and Troelsen A},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Acta orthopaedica},
  doi = {10.2340/17453674.2026.46805},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.46805}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Bicruciate-retaining versus cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty in implant fixation: a 10-year follow-up of a randomized RSA trial.
AU  - Kinoshita T
AU  - Mortensen KRL
AU  - Ingelsrud LH
AU  - Muharemovic O
AU  - Gromov K
AU  - Troelsen A
PY  - 2026
JO  - Acta orthopaedica
DO  - 10.2340/17453674.2026.46805
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.46805
ER  - 

APA

T, K., KRL, M., LH, I., O, M., K, G., & A, T. (2026). Bicruciate-retaining versus cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty in implant fixation: a 10-year follow-up of a randomized RSA trial.. Acta orthopaedica. https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2026.46805

Source records