Reply to Commentary: Govind A. Commentary: Inhalational Induction Without Vascular Access Should Be Rare in OMS. Anesthesia Progress. 2025;72(4):251–252. doi: 10.2344/24-0056

Michael K. Rollert

Open source

DOI
10.2344/26-0008
Published
2026-06
Container
Anesthesia Progress
Publisher
American Dental Society of Anesthesiology (ADSA)
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.2344/26-0008,
  title = {Reply to Commentary: Govind A. Commentary: Inhalational Induction Without Vascular Access Should Be Rare in OMS. Anesthesia Progress. 2025;72(4):251–252. doi: 10.2344/24-0056},
  author = {Michael K. Rollert},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Anesthesia Progress},
  doi = {10.2344/26-0008},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.2344/26-0008}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Reply to Commentary: Govind A. Commentary: Inhalational Induction Without Vascular Access Should Be Rare in OMS. Anesthesia Progress. 2025;72(4):251–252. doi: 10.2344/24-0056
AU  - Michael K. Rollert
PY  - 2026
JO  - Anesthesia Progress
DO  - 10.2344/26-0008
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2344/26-0008
ER  - 

APA

Rollert, M. K. (2026). Reply to Commentary: Govind A. Commentary: Inhalational Induction Without Vascular Access Should Be Rare in OMS. Anesthesia Progress. 2025;72(4):251–252. doi: 10.2344/24-0056. Anesthesia Progress. https://doi.org/10.2344/26-0008

Source records