Comparison between screw-retained and conometric technique in full-arch implant prosthetic rehabilitation regarding operative time needed: an in-vitro study
- DOI
- 10.23736/s2724-6329.26.05287-3
- Published
- 2026-08
- Container
- Minerva Dental and Oral Science
- Publisher
- Edizioni Minerva Medica
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.23736/s2724-6329.26.05287-3,
title = {Comparison between screw-retained and conometric technique in full-arch implant prosthetic rehabilitation regarding operative time needed: an in-vitro study},
author = {Pietro JACOTTI and Chiara CIOFFI and Fabio SAVOLDI and Luca VISCONTI and Nicola SCAZZERO and Domenico DALESSANDRI},
year = {2026},
journal = {Minerva Dental and Oral Science},
doi = {10.23736/s2724-6329.26.05287-3},
url = {https://doi.org/10.23736/s2724-6329.26.05287-3}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison between screw-retained and conometric technique in full-arch implant prosthetic rehabilitation regarding operative time needed: an in-vitro study AU - Pietro JACOTTI AU - Chiara CIOFFI AU - Fabio SAVOLDI AU - Luca VISCONTI AU - Nicola SCAZZERO AU - Domenico DALESSANDRI PY - 2026 JO - Minerva Dental and Oral Science DO - 10.23736/s2724-6329.26.05287-3 UR - https://doi.org/10.23736/s2724-6329.26.05287-3 ER -
APA
JACOTTI, P., CIOFFI, C., SAVOLDI, F., VISCONTI, L., SCAZZERO, N., & DALESSANDRI, D. (2026). Comparison between screw-retained and conometric technique in full-arch implant prosthetic rehabilitation regarding operative time needed: an in-vitro study. Minerva Dental and Oral Science. https://doi.org/10.23736/s2724-6329.26.05287-3
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T18:57:36.850Z