Academic oversight at a crossroads: Distinguishing legitimate post-publication criticism from online harassment.

Yu L

DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2026.593
Published: 2026 Nov 18
Container: Zoological research
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2026.593,
  title = {Academic oversight at a crossroads: Distinguishing legitimate post-publication criticism from online harassment.},
  author = {Yu L},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Zoological research},
  doi = {10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2026.593},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2026.593}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Academic oversight at a crossroads: Distinguishing legitimate post-publication criticism from online harassment.
AU  - Yu L
PY  - 2026
JO  - Zoological research
DO  - 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2026.593
UR  - https://doi.org/10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2026.593
ER  -

APA

L, Y. (2026). Academic oversight at a crossroads: Distinguishing legitimate post-publication criticism from online harassment.. Zoological research. https://doi.org/10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2026.593

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T14:57:39.751Z