Building Australia’s National Reserve System for 30 × 30: A Critique of New Biodiversity Datasets and Prioritization Frameworks, and Suggested Improvements to Achieve Effective Outcomes
- DOI
- 10.26187/deakin.34949356
- Published
- 2026
- Container
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Deakin University
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 47/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.26187/deakin.34949356,
title = {Building Australia’s National Reserve System for 30 × 30: A Critique of New Biodiversity Datasets and Prioritization Frameworks, and Suggested Improvements to Achieve Effective Outcomes},
author = {Doug Robinson and James Fitzsimons and Mathew J Hardy},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.26187/deakin.34949356},
url = {https://doi.org/10.26187/deakin.34949356}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Building Australia’s National Reserve System for 30 × 30: A Critique of New Biodiversity Datasets and Prioritization Frameworks, and Suggested Improvements to Achieve Effective Outcomes AU - Doug Robinson AU - James Fitzsimons AU - Mathew J Hardy PY - 2026 DO - 10.26187/deakin.34949356 UR - https://doi.org/10.26187/deakin.34949356 ER -
APA
Robinson, D., Fitzsimons, J., & Hardy, M. J. (2026). Building Australia’s National Reserve System for 30 × 30: A Critique of New Biodiversity Datasets and Prioritization Frameworks, and Suggested Improvements to Achieve Effective Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.26187/deakin.34949356
Source records
- datacite · retrieved 2026-11-10T04:24:49.985Z