Computed tomography colonography performs poorly in detection of sessile serrated lesions.

Kumar S, McCombie A, Richards S, Glyn T, Bone E, Eglinton T

DOI: 10.26635/6965.7109
Published: 2025 Dec 12
Container: The New Zealand medical journal
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.26635/6965.7109,
  title = {Computed tomography colonography performs poorly in detection of sessile serrated lesions.},
  author = {Kumar S and McCombie A and Richards S and Glyn T and Bone E and Eglinton T},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {The New Zealand medical journal},
  doi = {10.26635/6965.7109},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.7109}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Computed tomography colonography performs poorly in detection of sessile serrated lesions.
AU  - Kumar S
AU  - McCombie A
AU  - Richards S
AU  - Glyn T
AU  - Bone E
AU  - Eglinton T
PY  - 2025
JO  - The New Zealand medical journal
DO  - 10.26635/6965.7109
UR  - https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.7109
ER  -

APA

S, K., A, M., S, R., T, G., E, B., & T, E. (2025). Computed tomography colonography performs poorly in detection of sessile serrated lesions.. The New Zealand medical journal. https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.7109

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T09:59:30.009Z