Comparison of Empiric Versus Dosimetry-Guided Radioiodine Therapy: The Devil Is in the Details.
- DOI
- 10.2967/jnumed.116.186643
- Published
- 2017 May
- Container
- Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.2967/jnumed.116.186643,
title = {Comparison of Empiric Versus Dosimetry-Guided Radioiodine Therapy: The Devil Is in the Details.},
author = {Flux GD and Verburg FA and Chiesa C and Bardiès M and Gleisner KS and Hertz B and Konijnenberg M and Lassmann M and Ljungberg M and Luster M and Stabin M and Strigari L},
year = {2017},
journal = {Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine},
doi = {10.2967/jnumed.116.186643},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.186643}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of Empiric Versus Dosimetry-Guided Radioiodine Therapy: The Devil Is in the Details. AU - Flux GD AU - Verburg FA AU - Chiesa C AU - Bardiès M AU - Gleisner KS AU - Hertz B AU - Konijnenberg M AU - Lassmann M AU - Ljungberg M AU - Luster M AU - Stabin M AU - Strigari L PY - 2017 JO - Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine DO - 10.2967/jnumed.116.186643 UR - https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.186643 ER -
APA
GD, F., FA, V., C, C., M, B., KS, G., B, H., M, K., M, L., M, L., M, L., M, S., & L, S. (2017). Comparison of Empiric Versus Dosimetry-Guided Radioiodine Therapy: The Devil Is in the Details.. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.186643
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T15:37:31.736Z