Comparison of Empiric Versus Dosimetry-Guided Radioiodine Therapy: The Devil Is in the Details.

Flux GD, Verburg FA, Chiesa C, Bardiès M, Gleisner KS, Hertz B, Konijnenberg M, Lassmann M, Ljungberg M, Luster M, Stabin M, Strigari L

Open source

DOI
10.2967/jnumed.116.186643
Published
2017 May
Container
Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.2967/jnumed.116.186643,
  title = {Comparison of Empiric Versus Dosimetry-Guided Radioiodine Therapy: The Devil Is in the Details.},
  author = {Flux GD and Verburg FA and Chiesa C and Bardiès M and Gleisner KS and Hertz B and Konijnenberg M and Lassmann M and Ljungberg M and Luster M and Stabin M and Strigari L},
  year = {2017},
  journal = {Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine},
  doi = {10.2967/jnumed.116.186643},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.186643}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of Empiric Versus Dosimetry-Guided Radioiodine Therapy: The Devil Is in the Details.
AU  - Flux GD
AU  - Verburg FA
AU  - Chiesa C
AU  - Bardiès M
AU  - Gleisner KS
AU  - Hertz B
AU  - Konijnenberg M
AU  - Lassmann M
AU  - Ljungberg M
AU  - Luster M
AU  - Stabin M
AU  - Strigari L
PY  - 2017
JO  - Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine
DO  - 10.2967/jnumed.116.186643
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.186643
ER  - 

APA

GD, F., FA, V., C, C., M, B., KS, G., B, H., M, K., M, L., M, L., M, L., M, S., & L, S. (2017). Comparison of Empiric Versus Dosimetry-Guided Radioiodine Therapy: The Devil Is in the Details.. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.186643

Source records