Comparison of Expert Reads Versus Local Clinical Reads of Amyloid PET Scans in the IDEAS Study.
- DOI
- 10.2967/jnumed.126.272571
- Published
- 2026 Sep 10
- Container
- Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.2967/jnumed.126.272571,
title = {Comparison of Expert Reads Versus Local Clinical Reads of Amyloid PET Scans in the IDEAS Study.},
author = {Chiotis K and Windon CC and Siegel BA and Apgar C and Carrillo M and Gareen I and Hanna L and March A and Romanoff J and Gatsonis C and Rabinovici GD},
year = {2026},
journal = {Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine},
doi = {10.2967/jnumed.126.272571},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.126.272571}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of Expert Reads Versus Local Clinical Reads of Amyloid PET Scans in the IDEAS Study. AU - Chiotis K AU - Windon CC AU - Siegel BA AU - Apgar C AU - Carrillo M AU - Gareen I AU - Hanna L AU - March A AU - Romanoff J AU - Gatsonis C AU - Rabinovici GD PY - 2026 JO - Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine DO - 10.2967/jnumed.126.272571 UR - https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.126.272571 ER -
APA
K, C., CC, W., BA, S., C, A., M, C., I, G., L, H., A, M., J, R., C, G., & GD, R. (2026). Comparison of Expert Reads Versus Local Clinical Reads of Amyloid PET Scans in the IDEAS Study.. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.126.272571
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T18:11:48.767Z