Efficacy and Safety of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis.
- DOI
- 10.31083/rcm51636
- Published
- 2026 Oct
- Container
- Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.31083/rcm51636,
title = {Efficacy and Safety of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis.},
author = {Yu Y and Shang K and Jiao Y and Chang S and Li Y and Song G and Yin C},
year = {2026},
journal = {Reviews in cardiovascular medicine},
doi = {10.31083/rcm51636},
url = {https://doi.org/10.31083/rcm51636}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Efficacy and Safety of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis. AU - Yu Y AU - Shang K AU - Jiao Y AU - Chang S AU - Li Y AU - Song G AU - Yin C PY - 2026 JO - Reviews in cardiovascular medicine DO - 10.31083/rcm51636 UR - https://doi.org/10.31083/rcm51636 ER -
APA
Y, Y., K, S., Y, J., S, C., Y, L., G, S., & C, Y. (2026). Efficacy and Safety of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis.. Reviews in cardiovascular medicine. https://doi.org/10.31083/rcm51636
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T09:01:49.969Z