Should the Discipline of Family Medicine Honor Its Commitment to the Health of the Public by Defining Its Central Mission as “Continuity of Care” or as “Improving Health Outcomes”?

Kate Rowland, Donald Raj Woolever, Richelle Koopman

Open source

DOI
10.3122/jabfm.2026.260044r0
Published
2026-07
Container
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Publisher
American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM)
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3122/jabfm.2026.260044r0,
  title = {Should the Discipline of Family Medicine Honor Its Commitment to the Health of the Public by Defining Its Central Mission as “Continuity of Care” or as “Improving Health Outcomes”?},
  author = {Kate Rowland and Donald Raj Woolever and Richelle Koopman},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {The Journal of the American Board of Family
                Medicine},
  doi = {10.3122/jabfm.2026.260044r0},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2026.260044r0}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Should the Discipline of Family Medicine Honor Its Commitment to the Health of the Public by Defining Its Central Mission as “Continuity of Care” or as “Improving Health Outcomes”?
AU  - Kate Rowland
AU  - Donald Raj Woolever
AU  - Richelle Koopman
PY  - 2026
JO  - The Journal of the American Board of Family
                Medicine
DO  - 10.3122/jabfm.2026.260044r0
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2026.260044r0
ER  - 

APA

Rowland, K., Woolever, D. R., & Koopman, R. (2026). Should the Discipline of Family Medicine Honor Its Commitment to the Health of the Public by Defining Its Central Mission as “Continuity of Care” or as “Improving Health Outcomes”?. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2026.260044r0

Source records