A RCT study of DataCite metadata completeness to quantify the benefits of metadata quality on dataset uptake and sharing
- DOI
- 10.31222/osf.io/xv7tk
- Published
- 2021-02-16
- Container
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Center for Open Science
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 60/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- cautionPublication version: Identified as a preprint; peer review and later versions may change the record.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.31222/osf.io/xv7tk,
title = {A RCT study of DataCite metadata completeness to quantify the benefits of metadata quality on dataset uptake and sharing},
author = {Christopher I Hunter and Scott C Edmunds and SiZhe Xiao},
year = {2021},
doi = {10.31222/osf.io/xv7tk},
url = {https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/xv7tk}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A RCT study of DataCite metadata completeness to quantify the benefits of metadata quality on dataset uptake and sharing AU - Christopher I Hunter AU - Scott C Edmunds AU - SiZhe Xiao PY - 2021 DO - 10.31222/osf.io/xv7tk UR - https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/xv7tk ER -
APA
Hunter, C. I., Edmunds, S. C., & Xiao, S. (2021). A RCT study of DataCite metadata completeness to quantify the benefits of metadata quality on dataset uptake and sharing. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/xv7tk
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T08:46:16.337Z