Inter-Rater Reliability in Assessing the Methodological Quality of Research Papers in Psychology
- DOI
- 10.31234/osf.io/4w7rb_v3
- Published
- 2026-08-13
- Container
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Center for Open Science
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 60/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- cautionPublication version: Identified as a preprint; peer review and later versions may change the record.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.31234/osf.io/4w7rb_v3,
title = {Inter-Rater Reliability in Assessing the Methodological Quality of Research Papers in Psychology},
author = {Franka Tabitha Etzel and Anna Seyffert-Müller and Felix D. Schönbrodt and Lucie Kreuzer and Anne Gärtner and Paula Knischewski and Daniel Leising},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/4w7rb_v3},
url = {https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4w7rb_v3}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Inter-Rater Reliability in Assessing the Methodological Quality of Research Papers in Psychology AU - Franka Tabitha Etzel AU - Anna Seyffert-Müller AU - Felix D. Schönbrodt AU - Lucie Kreuzer AU - Anne Gärtner AU - Paula Knischewski AU - Daniel Leising PY - 2026 DO - 10.31234/osf.io/4w7rb_v3 UR - https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4w7rb_v3 ER -
APA
Etzel, F. T., Seyffert-Müller, A., Schönbrodt, F. D., Kreuzer, L., Gärtner, A., Knischewski, P., & Leising, D. (2026). Inter-Rater Reliability in Assessing the Methodological Quality of Research Papers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4w7rb_v3
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T09:54:38.625Z