Memory-driven attentional capture is not explained by inefficiënt task switching

Caro Hautekiet, Jarrod Lewis-Peacock, Christian Nicolas Leon Olivers

Open source

DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/8n9vt_v1
Published: 2026-06-18
Container: Not recorded
Publisher: Center for Open Science
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 60/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
cautionPublication version: Identified as a preprint; peer review and later versions may change the record. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.31234/osf.io/8n9vt_v1,
  title = {Memory-driven attentional capture is not explained by inefficiënt task switching},
  author = {Caro Hautekiet and Jarrod Lewis-Peacock and Christian Nicolas Leon Olivers},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.31234/osf.io/8n9vt_v1},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8n9vt_v1}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Memory-driven attentional capture is not explained by inefficiënt task switching
AU  - Caro Hautekiet
AU  - Jarrod Lewis-Peacock
AU  - Christian Nicolas Leon Olivers
PY  - 2026
DO  - 10.31234/osf.io/8n9vt_v1
UR  - https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8n9vt_v1
ER  -

APA

Hautekiet, C., Lewis-Peacock, J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2026). Memory-driven attentional capture is not explained by inefficiënt task switching. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8n9vt_v1

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T19:10:09.064Z