Thought Probe Response Options, but not Probe Frequency, Affect Thought Report Validity in a Cued Recall Episodic Memory Task

Cox SW, Kane MJ, Wahlheim CN.

Open source

DOI
10.31234/osf.io/az7jt_v1
Published
2026-08-21
Container
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 39/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.31234/osf.io/az7jt_v1,
  title = {Thought Probe Response Options, but not Probe Frequency, Affect Thought Report Validity in a Cued Recall Episodic Memory Task},
  author = {Cox SW and  Kane MJ and  Wahlheim CN.},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.31234/osf.io/az7jt_v1},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/az7jt_v1}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Thought Probe Response Options, but not Probe Frequency, Affect Thought Report Validity in a Cued Recall Episodic Memory Task
AU  - Cox SW
AU  -  Kane MJ
AU  -  Wahlheim CN.
PY  - 2026
DO  - 10.31234/osf.io/az7jt_v1
UR  - https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/az7jt_v1
ER  - 

APA

SW, C., MJ, K., & CN., W. (2026). Thought Probe Response Options, but not Probe Frequency, Affect Thought Report Validity in a Cued Recall Episodic Memory Task. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/az7jt_v1

Source records