A double-blinded randomised controlled trial - do subcuticular non-absorbable skin sutures have a better aesthetic outcome than skin staples in large wound closures?
- DOI
- 10.3205/iprs000142
- Published
- 2019-11-15
- Container
- GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW
- Publisher
- German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 61/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3205/iprs000142,
title = {A double-blinded randomised controlled trial - do subcuticular non-absorbable skin sutures have a better aesthetic outcome than skin staples in large wound closures?},
author = {Agilinko J and Tan P.},
year = {2019},
journal = {GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW},
doi = {10.3205/iprs000142},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3205/iprs000142}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A double-blinded randomised controlled trial - do subcuticular non-absorbable skin sutures have a better aesthetic outcome than skin staples in large wound closures? AU - Agilinko J AU - Tan P. PY - 2019 JO - GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW DO - 10.3205/iprs000142 UR - https://doi.org/10.3205/iprs000142 ER -
APA
J, A., & P., T. (2019). A double-blinded randomised controlled trial - do subcuticular non-absorbable skin sutures have a better aesthetic outcome than skin staples in large wound closures?. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. https://doi.org/10.3205/iprs000142
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T02:37:19.332Z
- datacite · retrieved 2026-09-25T02:37:19.324Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-25T02:37:19.300Z