In-house designed simulation courses versus society-accredited designs by international societies: A comparative analysis.
- DOI
- 10.3205/zma001756
- Published
- 2025
- Container
- GMS journal for medical education
- Publisher
- German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3205/zma001756,
title = {In-house designed simulation courses versus society-accredited designs by international societies: A comparative analysis.},
author = {Abramovich I and Beilstein J and Kornemann E and Berger-Estilita J and Schröder T},
year = {2025},
journal = {GMS journal for medical education},
doi = {10.3205/zma001756},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001756}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - In-house designed simulation courses versus society-accredited designs by international societies: A comparative analysis. AU - Abramovich I AU - Beilstein J AU - Kornemann E AU - Berger-Estilita J AU - Schröder T PY - 2025 JO - GMS journal for medical education DO - 10.3205/zma001756 UR - https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001756 ER -
APA
I, A., J, B., E, K., J, B., & T, S. (2025). In-house designed simulation courses versus society-accredited designs by international societies: A comparative analysis.. GMS journal for medical education. https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001756
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T18:03:27.281Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T18:03:27.302Z
- datacite · retrieved 2026-09-25T18:03:27.252Z