The Percutaneous shunting in Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction (PLUTO) study and randomised controlled trial: evaluation of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of percutaneous vesicoamniotic shunting for lower urinary tract obstruction.
- DOI
- 10.3310/hta17590
- Published
- 2013 Dec
- Container
- Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3310/hta17590,
title = {The Percutaneous shunting in Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction (PLUTO) study and randomised controlled trial: evaluation of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of percutaneous vesicoamniotic shunting for lower urinary tract obstruction.},
author = {Morris RK and Malin GL and Quinlan-Jones E and Middleton LJ and Diwakar L and Hemming K and Burke D and Daniels J and Denny E and Barton P and Roberts TE and Khan KS and Deeks JJ and Kilby MD},
year = {2013},
journal = {Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)},
doi = {10.3310/hta17590},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3310/hta17590}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - The Percutaneous shunting in Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction (PLUTO) study and randomised controlled trial: evaluation of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of percutaneous vesicoamniotic shunting for lower urinary tract obstruction. AU - Morris RK AU - Malin GL AU - Quinlan-Jones E AU - Middleton LJ AU - Diwakar L AU - Hemming K AU - Burke D AU - Daniels J AU - Denny E AU - Barton P AU - Roberts TE AU - Khan KS AU - Deeks JJ AU - Kilby MD PY - 2013 JO - Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) DO - 10.3310/hta17590 UR - https://doi.org/10.3310/hta17590 ER -
APA
RK, M., GL, M., E, Q., LJ, M., L, D., K, H., D, B., J, D., E, D., P, B., TE, R., KS, K., JJ, D., & MD, K. (2013). The Percutaneous shunting in Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction (PLUTO) study and randomised controlled trial: evaluation of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of percutaneous vesicoamniotic shunting for lower urinary tract obstruction.. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England). https://doi.org/10.3310/hta17590
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T13:01:15.443Z