A randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation against conventional artificial ventilation for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The OSCAR (OSCillation in ARDS) study.
- DOI
- 10.3310/hta19230
- Published
- 2015 Mar
- Container
- Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3310/hta19230,
title = {A randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation against conventional artificial ventilation for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The OSCAR (OSCillation in ARDS) study.},
author = {Lall R and Hamilton P and Young D and Hulme C and Hall P and Shah S and MacKenzie I and Tunnicliffe W and Rowan K and Cuthbertson B and McCabe C and Lamb S and OSCAR collaborators},
year = {2015},
journal = {Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)},
doi = {10.3310/hta19230},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3310/hta19230}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation against conventional artificial ventilation for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The OSCAR (OSCillation in ARDS) study. AU - Lall R AU - Hamilton P AU - Young D AU - Hulme C AU - Hall P AU - Shah S AU - MacKenzie I AU - Tunnicliffe W AU - Rowan K AU - Cuthbertson B AU - McCabe C AU - Lamb S AU - OSCAR collaborators PY - 2015 JO - Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) DO - 10.3310/hta19230 UR - https://doi.org/10.3310/hta19230 ER -
APA
R, L., P, H., D, Y., C, H., P, H., S, S., I, M., W, T., K, R., B, C., C, M., S, L., & collaborators, O. (2015). A randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation against conventional artificial ventilation for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The OSCAR (OSCillation in ARDS) study.. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England). https://doi.org/10.3310/hta19230
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T23:15:49.464Z