Clinical and cost-effectiveness of pessary self-management versus clinic-based care for pelvic organ prolapse in women: the TOPSY RCT with process evaluation.
- DOI
- 10.3310/nwtb5403
- Published
- 2024 May
- Container
- Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3310/nwtb5403,
title = {Clinical and cost-effectiveness of pessary self-management versus clinic-based care for pelvic organ prolapse in women: the TOPSY RCT with process evaluation.},
author = {Bugge C and Hagen S and Elders A and Mason H and Goodman K and Dembinsky M and Melone L and Best C and Manoukian S and Dwyer L and Khunda A and Graham M and Agur W and Breeman S and Culverhouse J and Forrest A and Forrest M and Guerrero K and Hemming C and McClurg D and Norrie J and Thakar R and Kearney R},
year = {2024},
journal = {Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)},
doi = {10.3310/nwtb5403},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3310/nwtb5403}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Clinical and cost-effectiveness of pessary self-management versus clinic-based care for pelvic organ prolapse in women: the TOPSY RCT with process evaluation. AU - Bugge C AU - Hagen S AU - Elders A AU - Mason H AU - Goodman K AU - Dembinsky M AU - Melone L AU - Best C AU - Manoukian S AU - Dwyer L AU - Khunda A AU - Graham M AU - Agur W AU - Breeman S AU - Culverhouse J AU - Forrest A AU - Forrest M AU - Guerrero K AU - Hemming C AU - McClurg D AU - Norrie J AU - Thakar R AU - Kearney R PY - 2024 JO - Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) DO - 10.3310/nwtb5403 UR - https://doi.org/10.3310/nwtb5403 ER -
APA
C, B., S, H., A, E., H, M., K, G., M, D., L, M., C, B., S, M., L, D., A, K., M, G., W, A., S, B., J, C., A, F., M, F., K, G., C, H., D, M., J, N., R, T., & R, K. (2024). Clinical and cost-effectiveness of pessary self-management versus clinic-based care for pelvic organ prolapse in women: the TOPSY RCT with process evaluation.. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England). https://doi.org/10.3310/nwtb5403
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T18:47:04.487Z