Biomechanical and clinical comparison of a novel dual-wing locking plate versus the PHILOS plate for neer three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures: a finite element analysis combined with a retrospective cohort study.
- DOI
- 10.3389/fbioe.2026.1865863
- Published
- 2026-08-19
- Container
- Front Bioeng Biotechnol
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3389/fbioe.2026.1865863,
title = {Biomechanical and clinical comparison of a novel dual-wing locking plate versus the PHILOS plate for neer three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures: a finite element analysis combined with a retrospective cohort study.},
author = {Ji J and Zhao Q and Wei S and Hu X and Deng Y and Chen Z and Gu J and Chen C.},
year = {2026},
journal = {Front Bioeng Biotechnol},
doi = {10.3389/fbioe.2026.1865863},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2026.1865863}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Biomechanical and clinical comparison of a novel dual-wing locking plate versus the PHILOS plate for neer three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures: a finite element analysis combined with a retrospective cohort study. AU - Ji J AU - Zhao Q AU - Wei S AU - Hu X AU - Deng Y AU - Chen Z AU - Gu J AU - Chen C. PY - 2026 JO - Front Bioeng Biotechnol DO - 10.3389/fbioe.2026.1865863 UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2026.1865863 ER -
APA
J, J., Q, Z., S, W., X, H., Y, D., Z, C., J, G., & C., C. (2026). Biomechanical and clinical comparison of a novel dual-wing locking plate versus the PHILOS plate for neer three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures: a finite element analysis combined with a retrospective cohort study.. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2026.1865863
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T13:08:35.275Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-25T13:08:35.284Z