A retrospective comparative diagnostic evaluation of three commercial qPCR kits for the diagnosis of mpox virus on an enriched sample set.
- DOI
- 10.3389/fcimb.2026.1831182
- Published
- 2026
- Container
- Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3389/fcimb.2026.1831182,
title = {A retrospective comparative diagnostic evaluation of three commercial qPCR kits for the diagnosis of mpox virus on an enriched sample set.},
author = {Paredes-Núñez D and Salgado S and Sánchez M and Chávez-Toledo KN and Parrales J and Tinizaray A and Zúñiga-Velarde JJ and Orlando SA and Garcia-Bereguiain MA},
year = {2026},
journal = {Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology},
doi = {10.3389/fcimb.2026.1831182},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2026.1831182}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A retrospective comparative diagnostic evaluation of three commercial qPCR kits for the diagnosis of mpox virus on an enriched sample set. AU - Paredes-Núñez D AU - Salgado S AU - Sánchez M AU - Chávez-Toledo KN AU - Parrales J AU - Tinizaray A AU - Zúñiga-Velarde JJ AU - Orlando SA AU - Garcia-Bereguiain MA PY - 2026 JO - Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology DO - 10.3389/fcimb.2026.1831182 UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2026.1831182 ER -
APA
D, P., S, S., M, S., KN, C., J, P., A, T., JJ, Z., SA, O., & MA, G. (2026). A retrospective comparative diagnostic evaluation of three commercial qPCR kits for the diagnosis of mpox virus on an enriched sample set.. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2026.1831182
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T14:09:54.931Z