Efficacy and safety of conscious/deep sedation versus general anesthesia in pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sun W, Feng R, Fu X, Zhang N, Sun M, Guo M, Gao J, Wang R

Open source

DOI
10.3389/fcvm.2026.1933701
Published
2026
Container
Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3389/fcvm.2026.1933701,
  title = {Efficacy and safety of conscious/deep sedation versus general anesthesia in pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.},
  author = {Sun W and Feng R and Fu X and Zhang N and Sun M and Guo M and Gao J and Wang R},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine},
  doi = {10.3389/fcvm.2026.1933701},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1933701}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Efficacy and safety of conscious/deep sedation versus general anesthesia in pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
AU  - Sun W
AU  - Feng R
AU  - Fu X
AU  - Zhang N
AU  - Sun M
AU  - Guo M
AU  - Gao J
AU  - Wang R
PY  - 2026
JO  - Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
DO  - 10.3389/fcvm.2026.1933701
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1933701
ER  - 

APA

W, S., R, F., X, F., N, Z., M, S., M, G., J, G., & R, W. (2026). Efficacy and safety of conscious/deep sedation versus general anesthesia in pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1933701

Source records