Definitional ambiguity in cognitive warfare: a critical and systematic conceptual review through ideal-type analysis.

Nilsson PE, Haga A, Hellström K

Open source

DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2026.1762571
Published: 2026
Container: Frontiers in big data
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3389/fdata.2026.1762571,
  title = {Definitional ambiguity in cognitive warfare: a critical and systematic conceptual review through ideal-type analysis.},
  author = {Nilsson PE and Haga A and Hellström K},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Frontiers in big data},
  doi = {10.3389/fdata.2026.1762571},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2026.1762571}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Definitional ambiguity in cognitive warfare: a critical and systematic conceptual review through ideal-type analysis.
AU  - Nilsson PE
AU  - Haga A
AU  - Hellström K
PY  - 2026
JO  - Frontiers in big data
DO  - 10.3389/fdata.2026.1762571
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2026.1762571
ER  -

APA

PE, N., A, H., & K, H. (2026). Definitional ambiguity in cognitive warfare: a critical and systematic conceptual review through ideal-type analysis.. Frontiers in big data. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2026.1762571

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:14:11.403Z
europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:14:11.390Z
doaj · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:14:11.373Z