Validity of resting heart rate derived from contact-based smartphone photoplethysmography compared with electrocardiography: a scoping review and checklist for optimal acquisition and reporting

James D. Mather, Lawrence D. Hayes, Jacqueline L. Mair, Nicholas F. Sculthorpe

Open source

DOI
10.3389/fdgth.2024.1326511
Published
2024-02-29
Container
Frontiers in Digital Health
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3389/fdgth.2024.1326511,
  title = {Validity of resting heart rate derived from contact-based smartphone photoplethysmography compared with electrocardiography: a scoping review and checklist for optimal acquisition and reporting},
  author = {James D. Mather and Lawrence D. Hayes and Jacqueline L. Mair and Nicholas F. Sculthorpe},
  year = {2024},
  journal = {Frontiers in Digital Health},
  doi = {10.3389/fdgth.2024.1326511},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1326511}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Validity of resting heart rate derived from contact-based smartphone photoplethysmography compared with electrocardiography: a scoping review and checklist for optimal acquisition and reporting
AU  - James D. Mather
AU  - Lawrence D. Hayes
AU  - Jacqueline L. Mair
AU  - Nicholas F. Sculthorpe
PY  - 2024
JO  - Frontiers in Digital Health
DO  - 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1326511
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1326511
ER  - 

APA

Mather, J. D., Hayes, L. D., Mair, J. L., & Sculthorpe, N. F. (2024). Validity of resting heart rate derived from contact-based smartphone photoplethysmography compared with electrocardiography: a scoping review and checklist for optimal acquisition and reporting. Frontiers in Digital Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1326511

Source records