The comparison of gasless and traditional robot-assisted transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in hysterectomy.

Mei Y, He L, Zhang Q, Chen Y, Zheng J, Xiao X, Lin Y

Open source

DOI
10.3389/fmed.2023.1117158
Published
2023
Container
Frontiers in medicine
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3389/fmed.2023.1117158,
  title = {The comparison of gasless and traditional robot-assisted transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in hysterectomy.},
  author = {Mei Y and He L and Zhang Q and Chen Y and Zheng J and Xiao X and Lin Y},
  year = {2023},
  journal = {Frontiers in medicine},
  doi = {10.3389/fmed.2023.1117158},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1117158}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - The comparison of gasless and traditional robot-assisted transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in hysterectomy.
AU  - Mei Y
AU  - He L
AU  - Zhang Q
AU  - Chen Y
AU  - Zheng J
AU  - Xiao X
AU  - Lin Y
PY  - 2023
JO  - Frontiers in medicine
DO  - 10.3389/fmed.2023.1117158
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1117158
ER  - 

APA

Y, M., L, H., Q, Z., Y, C., J, Z., X, X., & Y, L. (2023). The comparison of gasless and traditional robot-assisted transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in hysterectomy.. Frontiers in medicine. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1117158

Source records