A comparative analysis of hysterectomy outcomes: robotic single-port vs. traditional transvaginal NOTES approaches.

Yang Q, Lovell DY, Wu J, Zhang C, Guan X

DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1614384
Published: 2025
Container: Frontiers in medicine
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3389/fmed.2025.1614384,
  title = {A comparative analysis of hysterectomy outcomes: robotic single-port vs. traditional transvaginal NOTES approaches.},
  author = {Yang Q and Lovell DY and Wu J and Zhang C and Guan X},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Frontiers in medicine},
  doi = {10.3389/fmed.2025.1614384},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1614384}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - A comparative analysis of hysterectomy outcomes: robotic single-port vs. traditional transvaginal NOTES approaches.
AU  - Yang Q
AU  - Lovell DY
AU  - Wu J
AU  - Zhang C
AU  - Guan X
PY  - 2025
JO  - Frontiers in medicine
DO  - 10.3389/fmed.2025.1614384
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1614384
ER  -

APA

Q, Y., DY, L., J, W., C, Z., & X, G. (2025). A comparative analysis of hysterectomy outcomes: robotic single-port vs. traditional transvaginal NOTES approaches.. Frontiers in medicine. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1614384

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T19:42:24.629Z