Intracardiac echocardiography guided zero-fluoroscopy workflow versus conventional fluoroscopy-guided workflow in atrial fibrillation ablation: efficiency, safety, and operator experience.

Yang Z, Wu H, Zhuo S, Zhang L, Yuan D, Wang S, Lin L, Xu Y, Du X

Open source

DOI
10.3389/fmed.2026.1928162
Published
2026
Container
Frontiers in medicine
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3389/fmed.2026.1928162,
  title = {Intracardiac echocardiography guided zero-fluoroscopy workflow versus conventional fluoroscopy-guided workflow in atrial fibrillation ablation: efficiency, safety, and operator experience.},
  author = {Yang Z and Wu H and Zhuo S and Zhang L and Yuan D and Wang S and Lin L and Xu Y and Du X},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Frontiers in medicine},
  doi = {10.3389/fmed.2026.1928162},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1928162}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Intracardiac echocardiography guided zero-fluoroscopy workflow versus conventional fluoroscopy-guided workflow in atrial fibrillation ablation: efficiency, safety, and operator experience.
AU  - Yang Z
AU  - Wu H
AU  - Zhuo S
AU  - Zhang L
AU  - Yuan D
AU  - Wang S
AU  - Lin L
AU  - Xu Y
AU  - Du X
PY  - 2026
JO  - Frontiers in medicine
DO  - 10.3389/fmed.2026.1928162
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1928162
ER  - 

APA

Z, Y., H, W., S, Z., L, Z., D, Y., S, W., L, L., Y, X., & X, D. (2026). Intracardiac echocardiography guided zero-fluoroscopy workflow versus conventional fluoroscopy-guided workflow in atrial fibrillation ablation: efficiency, safety, and operator experience.. Frontiers in medicine. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1928162

Source records