Comparison of piezosurgery vs. conventional bone chisel for extraction of impacted mandibular third molars with root–canal intimacy: a retrospective cohort study with CBCT-based preoperative planning
- DOI
- 10.3389/fmed.2026.1950396
- Published
- 2026-10-16
- Container
- Frontiers in Medicine
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3389/fmed.2026.1950396,
title = {Comparison of piezosurgery vs. conventional bone chisel for extraction of impacted mandibular third molars with root–canal intimacy: a retrospective cohort study with CBCT-based preoperative planning},
author = {Huijun Hu and Yuchao Zhang and Jian Tan and Yang Yu},
year = {2026},
journal = {Frontiers in Medicine},
doi = {10.3389/fmed.2026.1950396},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1950396}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of piezosurgery vs. conventional bone chisel for extraction of impacted mandibular third molars with root–canal intimacy: a retrospective cohort study with CBCT-based preoperative planning AU - Huijun Hu AU - Yuchao Zhang AU - Jian Tan AU - Yang Yu PY - 2026 JO - Frontiers in Medicine DO - 10.3389/fmed.2026.1950396 UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1950396 ER -
APA
Hu, H., Zhang, Y., Tan, J., & Yu, Y. (2026). Comparison of piezosurgery vs. conventional bone chisel for extraction of impacted mandibular third molars with root–canal intimacy: a retrospective cohort study with CBCT-based preoperative planning. Frontiers in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1950396
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-03T12:23:36.316Z