Video consultation for non-acute headache by neurologist is not inferior to traditional consultations in terms of headache consultation rate at follow-up: post hoc analyses of a randomized controlled trial.
- DOI
- 10.3389/fneur.2026.1798381
- Published
- 2026
- Container
- Frontiers in neurology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3389/fneur.2026.1798381,
title = {Video consultation for non-acute headache by neurologist is not inferior to traditional consultations in terms of headache consultation rate at follow-up: post hoc analyses of a randomized controlled trial.},
author = {Bekkelund SI and Müller KI},
year = {2026},
journal = {Frontiers in neurology},
doi = {10.3389/fneur.2026.1798381},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1798381}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Video consultation for non-acute headache by neurologist is not inferior to traditional consultations in terms of headache consultation rate at follow-up: post hoc analyses of a randomized controlled trial. AU - Bekkelund SI AU - Müller KI PY - 2026 JO - Frontiers in neurology DO - 10.3389/fneur.2026.1798381 UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1798381 ER -
APA
SI, B., & KI, M. (2026). Video consultation for non-acute headache by neurologist is not inferior to traditional consultations in terms of headache consultation rate at follow-up: post hoc analyses of a randomized controlled trial.. Frontiers in neurology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1798381
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T12:04:40.176Z