Comparative effectiveness of standard vs. AI-assisted PET/CT reading workflow for pre-treatment lymphoma staging: a multi-institutional reader study evaluation.
- DOI
- 10.3389/fnume.2023.1327186
- Published
- 2023
- Container
- Frontiers in nuclear medicine
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3389/fnume.2023.1327186,
title = {Comparative effectiveness of standard vs. AI-assisted PET/CT reading workflow for pre-treatment lymphoma staging: a multi-institutional reader study evaluation.},
author = {Frood R and Willaime JMY and Miles B and Chambers G and Al-Chalabi H and Ali T and Hougham N and Brooks N and Petrides G and Naylor M and Ward D and Sulkin T and Chaytor R and Strouhal P and Patel C and Scarsbrook AF},
year = {2023},
journal = {Frontiers in nuclear medicine},
doi = {10.3389/fnume.2023.1327186},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fnume.2023.1327186}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparative effectiveness of standard vs. AI-assisted PET/CT reading workflow for pre-treatment lymphoma staging: a multi-institutional reader study evaluation. AU - Frood R AU - Willaime JMY AU - Miles B AU - Chambers G AU - Al-Chalabi H AU - Ali T AU - Hougham N AU - Brooks N AU - Petrides G AU - Naylor M AU - Ward D AU - Sulkin T AU - Chaytor R AU - Strouhal P AU - Patel C AU - Scarsbrook AF PY - 2023 JO - Frontiers in nuclear medicine DO - 10.3389/fnume.2023.1327186 UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fnume.2023.1327186 ER -
APA
R, F., JMY, W., B, M., G, C., H, A., T, A., N, H., N, B., G, P., M, N., D, W., T, S., R, C., P, S., C, P., & AF, S. (2023). Comparative effectiveness of standard vs. AI-assisted PET/CT reading workflow for pre-treatment lymphoma staging: a multi-institutional reader study evaluation.. Frontiers in nuclear medicine. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnume.2023.1327186
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T22:11:37.913Z