Ovarian dose prediction after ovarian transposition in cervical cancer: comparing three models and the impact of geometric distance on predictive performance.

An X, Jiao M, Dong ZW, Teng F, Zhang LN

Open source

DOI
10.3389/fonc.2026.1906826
Published
2026
Container
Frontiers in oncology
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3389/fonc.2026.1906826,
  title = {Ovarian dose prediction after ovarian transposition in cervical cancer: comparing three models and the impact of geometric distance on predictive performance.},
  author = {An X and Jiao M and Dong ZW and Teng F and Zhang LN},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Frontiers in oncology},
  doi = {10.3389/fonc.2026.1906826},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1906826}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Ovarian dose prediction after ovarian transposition in cervical cancer: comparing three models and the impact of geometric distance on predictive performance.
AU  - An X
AU  - Jiao M
AU  - Dong ZW
AU  - Teng F
AU  - Zhang LN
PY  - 2026
JO  - Frontiers in oncology
DO  - 10.3389/fonc.2026.1906826
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1906826
ER  - 

APA

X, A., M, J., ZW, D., F, T., & LN, Z. (2026). Ovarian dose prediction after ovarian transposition in cervical cancer: comparing three models and the impact of geometric distance on predictive performance.. Frontiers in oncology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1906826

Source records