Passage of Time Judgments Are Not Duration Judgments: Evidence from a Study Using Experience Sampling Methodology

Sylvie Droit-Volet, John Wearden

Open source

DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00176
Published
2016-02-19
Container
Frontiers in Psychology
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00176,
  title = {Passage of Time Judgments Are Not Duration Judgments: Evidence from a Study Using Experience Sampling Methodology},
  author = {Sylvie Droit-Volet and John Wearden},
  year = {2016},
  journal = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00176},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00176}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Passage of Time Judgments Are Not Duration Judgments: Evidence from a Study Using Experience Sampling Methodology
AU  - Sylvie Droit-Volet
AU  - John Wearden
PY  - 2016
JO  - Frontiers in Psychology
DO  - 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00176
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00176
ER  - 

APA

Droit-Volet, S., & Wearden, J. (2016). Passage of Time Judgments Are Not Duration Judgments: Evidence from a Study Using Experience Sampling Methodology. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00176

Source records