The Social Utility of Ambivalence: Being Ambivalent on Controversial Issues Is Recognized as Competence.

Pillaud V, Cavazza N, Butera F.

Open source

DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00961
Published: 2018-06-22
Container: Front Psychol
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00961,
  title = {The Social Utility of Ambivalence: Being Ambivalent on Controversial Issues Is Recognized as Competence.},
  author = {Pillaud V and  Cavazza N and  Butera F.},
  year = {2018},
  journal = {Front Psychol},
  doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00961},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00961}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - The Social Utility of Ambivalence: Being Ambivalent on Controversial Issues Is Recognized as Competence.
AU  - Pillaud V
AU  -  Cavazza N
AU  -  Butera F.
PY  - 2018
JO  - Front Psychol
DO  - 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00961
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00961
ER  -

APA

V, P., N, C., & F., B. (2018). The Social Utility of Ambivalence: Being Ambivalent on Controversial Issues Is Recognized as Competence.. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00961

Source records

europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T00:10:15.364Z
doaj · retrieved 2026-09-26T00:10:15.391Z
hal · retrieved 2026-09-26T00:10:15.406Z