What kind of science for dual diagnosis? A pragmatic examination of the enactive approach to psychiatry

Jonathan Led Larsen, Katrine Schepelern Johansen, Mimi Yung Mehlsen

Open source

DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.825701
Published
2022-07-18
Container
Frontiers in Psychology
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.825701,
  title = {What kind of science for dual diagnosis? A pragmatic examination of the enactive approach to psychiatry},
  author = {Jonathan Led Larsen and Katrine Schepelern Johansen and Mimi Yung Mehlsen},
  year = {2022},
  journal = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2022.825701},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.825701}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - What kind of science for dual diagnosis? A pragmatic examination of the enactive approach to psychiatry
AU  - Jonathan Led Larsen
AU  - Katrine Schepelern Johansen
AU  - Mimi Yung Mehlsen
PY  - 2022
JO  - Frontiers in Psychology
DO  - 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.825701
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.825701
ER  - 

APA

Larsen, J. L., Johansen, K. S., & Mehlsen, M. Y. (2022). What kind of science for dual diagnosis? A pragmatic examination of the enactive approach to psychiatry. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.825701

Source records