Cues to deception: can complications, common knowledge details, and self-handicapping strategies discriminate between truths, embedded lies and outright lies in an Italian-speaking sample?
- DOI
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128194
- Published
- 2023
- Container
- Frontiers in psychology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128194,
title = {Cues to deception: can complications, common knowledge details, and self-handicapping strategies discriminate between truths, embedded lies and outright lies in an Italian-speaking sample?},
author = {Caso L and Cavagnis L and Vrij A and Palena N},
year = {2023},
journal = {Frontiers in psychology},
doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128194},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128194}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Cues to deception: can complications, common knowledge details, and self-handicapping strategies discriminate between truths, embedded lies and outright lies in an Italian-speaking sample? AU - Caso L AU - Cavagnis L AU - Vrij A AU - Palena N PY - 2023 JO - Frontiers in psychology DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128194 UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128194 ER -
APA
L, C., L, C., A, V., & N, P. (2023). Cues to deception: can complications, common knowledge details, and self-handicapping strategies discriminate between truths, embedded lies and outright lies in an Italian-speaking sample?. Frontiers in psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128194
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T19:35:41.871Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T19:35:41.895Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-25T19:35:41.898Z