Comparison of different reliability estimation methods for single-item assessment: a simulation study

Sijun Zhang, Kimberly Colvin

Open source

DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1482016
Published
2024-11-01
Container
Frontiers in Psychology
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1482016,
  title = {Comparison of different reliability estimation methods for single-item assessment: a simulation study},
  author = {Sijun Zhang and Kimberly Colvin},
  year = {2024},
  journal = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1482016},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1482016}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of different reliability estimation methods for single-item assessment: a simulation study
AU  - Sijun Zhang
AU  - Kimberly Colvin
PY  - 2024
JO  - Frontiers in Psychology
DO  - 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1482016
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1482016
ER  - 

APA

Zhang, S., & Colvin, K. (2024). Comparison of different reliability estimation methods for single-item assessment: a simulation study. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1482016

Source records