Internal security vs. external options: a goal-shielding explanation of how employability differentially shapes unethical pro-organizational behavior.

Niu Y, Liu D, Niu X

Open source

DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1605697
Published
2025
Container
Frontiers in psychology
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1605697,
  title = {Internal security vs. external options: a goal-shielding explanation of how employability differentially shapes unethical pro-organizational behavior.},
  author = {Niu Y and Liu D and Niu X},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Frontiers in psychology},
  doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1605697},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1605697}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Internal security vs. external options: a goal-shielding explanation of how employability differentially shapes unethical pro-organizational behavior.
AU  - Niu Y
AU  - Liu D
AU  - Niu X
PY  - 2025
JO  - Frontiers in psychology
DO  - 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1605697
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1605697
ER  - 

APA

Y, N., D, L., & X, N. (2025). Internal security vs. external options: a goal-shielding explanation of how employability differentially shapes unethical pro-organizational behavior.. Frontiers in psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1605697

Source records