Do undergraduate psychology statistics textbooks make connections to their underlying epistemological basis?

Neal M. Kingston, Taylor D. Wilson, Rafael Quintana, Anqi Peng

Open source

DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1641211
Published
2025-09-29
Container
Frontiers in Psychology
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1641211,
  title = {Do undergraduate psychology statistics textbooks make connections to their underlying epistemological basis?},
  author = {Neal M. Kingston and Taylor D. Wilson and Rafael Quintana and Anqi Peng},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1641211},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1641211}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Do undergraduate psychology statistics textbooks make connections to their underlying epistemological basis?
AU  - Neal M. Kingston
AU  - Taylor D. Wilson
AU  - Rafael Quintana
AU  - Anqi Peng
PY  - 2025
JO  - Frontiers in Psychology
DO  - 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1641211
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1641211
ER  - 

APA

Kingston, N. M., Wilson, T. D., Quintana, R., & Peng, A. (2025). Do undergraduate psychology statistics textbooks make connections to their underlying epistemological basis?. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1641211

Source records