Why peer-led crisis plan practice does — and does not — transform psychiatric ward culture: a realist-informed qualitative study from Japan

Mikie Ebihara, Michiko Ban, Tatsuya Tamura, Tomoko Omiya, Kumiko Ando

Open source

DOI
10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1915695
Published
9
Container
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1915695,
  title = {Why peer-led crisis plan practice does — and does not — transform psychiatric ward culture: a realist-informed qualitative study from Japan},
  author = {Mikie Ebihara and Michiko Ban and Tatsuya Tamura and Tomoko Omiya and Kumiko Ando},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Frontiers in Psychiatry},
  doi = {10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1915695},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1915695}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Why peer-led crisis plan practice does — and does not — transform psychiatric ward culture: a realist-informed qualitative study from Japan
AU  - Mikie Ebihara
AU  - Michiko Ban
AU  - Tatsuya Tamura
AU  - Tomoko Omiya
AU  - Kumiko Ando
PY  - 2026
JO  - Frontiers in Psychiatry
DO  - 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1915695
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1915695
ER  - 

APA

Ebihara, M., Ban, M., Tamura, T., Omiya, T., & Ando, K. (2026). Why peer-led crisis plan practice does — and does not — transform psychiatric ward culture: a realist-informed qualitative study from Japan. Frontiers in Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1915695

Source records