Users' perception of the OH-EpiCap evaluation tool based on its application to nine national antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems.
- DOI
- 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1138645
- Published
- 2023
- Container
- Frontiers in public health
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1138645,
title = {Users' perception of the OH-EpiCap evaluation tool based on its application to nine national antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems.},
author = {Moura P and Collineau L and Sandberg M and Tomassone L and De Meneghi D and Norström M and Bennani H and Häsler B and Colomb-Cotinat M and Bourély C and Filippitzi ME and Mediouni S and Boriani E and Asaduzzaman M and Caniça M and Aenishaenslin C and Alban L},
year = {2023},
journal = {Frontiers in public health},
doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2023.1138645},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1138645}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Users' perception of the OH-EpiCap evaluation tool based on its application to nine national antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems. AU - Moura P AU - Collineau L AU - Sandberg M AU - Tomassone L AU - De Meneghi D AU - Norström M AU - Bennani H AU - Häsler B AU - Colomb-Cotinat M AU - Bourély C AU - Filippitzi ME AU - Mediouni S AU - Boriani E AU - Asaduzzaman M AU - Caniça M AU - Aenishaenslin C AU - Alban L PY - 2023 JO - Frontiers in public health DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1138645 UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1138645 ER -
APA
P, M., L, C., M, S., L, T., D, D. M., M, N., H, B., B, H., M, C., C, B., ME, F., S, M., E, B., M, A., M, C., C, A., & L, A. (2023). Users' perception of the OH-EpiCap evaluation tool based on its application to nine national antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems.. Frontiers in public health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1138645
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T12:25:23.864Z